The Controversy Unfolds
The K-pop world is buzzing with the LE SSERAFIM Red Velvet plagiarism controversy. The accusations emerged after LE SSERAFIM released teaser images for their Japanese version of “Crazy.” These images quickly drew comparisons to Red Velvet’s “Chill Kill” concept, sparking heated debates across social media platforms.
The controversy started on social media platform X and rapidly spread to Korean forums. Fans noticed striking similarities between the black and white aesthetics and vintage-style filters used in both groups’ concepts. The timing of the release made the situation even more controversial, as Red Velvet’s concept was still fresh in fans’ memories.
International fans joined the discussion, sharing side-by-side comparisons of both concepts. The viral posts highlighted specific details, from the lighting techniques to the positioning of the members in the photos.
Comparing the Concepts
The LE SSERAFIM Red Velvet plagiarism debate centers on specific visual elements. Both photoshoots feature dark, eerie atmospheres and similar styling choices. Red Velvet’s “Chill Kill” concept, released in 2023, earned widespread praise for its unique and haunting beauty, setting a new standard for K-pop visual concepts.
Some fans pointed out that both shoots were done by photographer Cho Gi Seok. However, this explanation hasn’t satisfied many critics who see the similarities as too close for comfort. Industry experts have weighed in, noting that while working with the same photographer is common, concepts should maintain distinctiveness.
The styling choices in both shoots have drawn particular attention. From the vintage-inspired wardrobes to the moody lighting techniques, critics argue that LE SSERAFIM’s concept appears to be more than just inspired by Red Velvet’s work.
Public Response and Reactions
The controversy has sparked intense discussions on Korean forums. A post on TheQoo discussing the LE SSERAFIM Red Velvet plagiarism issue garnered over 50,000 views. Many netizens expressed disappointment in what they perceived as a lack of originality, with some questioning the creative direction behind the concept.
Korean fans have been particularly vocal about the quality comparison between the two concepts. Comments on various platforms suggest that while the similarity is evident, the execution of LE SSERAFIM’s concept falls short of Red Velvet’s original vision.
Some fans also noted similarities between LE SSERAFIM’s concept clip and Red Velvet’s “Birthday” comeback. The debate continues between both fandoms, with each side presenting their arguments. LE SSERAFIM’s supporters maintain that similar concepts are common in K-pop, while critics argue this case goes beyond mere inspiration.
Industry Impact and Precedent
This controversy has reignited discussions about creativity and originality in K-pop. Industry insiders suggest that while inspiration from other artists is normal, maintaining unique identity is crucial for group success.
The situation has also sparked conversations about the role of creative teams and agencies in concept development. Some fans are calling for more transparency in the creative process to avoid similar controversies in the future.
Final Thoughts: LE SSERAFIM Red Velvet Plagiarism Controversy Continues
The situation remains contentious as LE SSERAFIM prepares for their December 11 Japanese release. The controversy has highlighted the fine line between inspiration and imitation in K-pop. As the industry continues to grow, these discussions become increasingly important for maintaining artistic integrity.
What are your thoughts on these concept similarities? Do you think the accusations are justified, or is this a case of coincidental similarity? Share your opinion in the comments below!
