This contains an image of WINNER's Mino

WINNER Mino Faces Legal Battle Over $17K Giraffe Art Sale

WINNER Mino’s Art Sale Controversy Unfolds

WINNER’s Mino is facing a serious legal battle over his artwork “I Thought.” The controversy centers around a $17,500 giraffe artwork sale that went terribly wrong. This situation has sparked intense discussions about artist responsibility and gallery management.

This contains an image of WINNER's Mino with glasses sitting down in front of a tv screen wearing a purple jacket

Many fans know Mino isn’t just a talented idol. He debuted as an artist in 2019, showcasing his creative side beyond music. His unique artistic style quickly gained attention in the art world. But his first solo exhibition in December 2022 has led to unexpected drama that’s still unfolding today.

See Also: Single’s Inferno Star Kim Hye Jin Stuns With aespa Karina Resemblance

The Art Sale That Started It All

A buyer, who remains anonymous, purchased Mino’s giraffe artwork through a gallery for ₩25.0 million KRW. They followed all proper procedures, paying the full amount in three installments. The gallery provided official receipts, making the transaction seem legitimate and secure.

This contains an image of WINNER's Mino

However, the artwork was never delivered as promised. The gallery representatives kept making excuses about international exhibitions and scheduling conflicts. The situation became more suspicious with each passing month. Things got more complicated when it was revealed the artwork had already been promised to one of Mino’s singer friends.

Behind-the-Scenes Drama

The gallery curator tried to smooth things over by offering an alternative solution. They suggested Mino could create a similar but new artwork for the same price. This proposal didn’t sit well with the buyer, who had specifically wanted the original piece displayed at the exhibition.

This contains an image of WINNER's Mino with red hair wearing a black shirt

Adding to the confusion, Mino reportedly told YG Entertainment’s Yang Hyun Suk that he hadn’t sold the artwork. This contradiction raised questions about communication between the artist, gallery, and buyers. The gallery’s role in this mishap became increasingly scrutinized.

See also  Breaking Free? AleXa Drops Clues About Leaving ZB LABEL

The court’s first ruling favored the buyer after careful consideration of all evidence. They ordered Mino to either deliver the artwork or refund the money. The situation got more intense when the buyer asked for additional compensation of ₩40.0 million KRW.

The buyer spent about ₩20.0 million KRW on legal fees alone. They’re still fighting for justice after two years of emotional stress and financial burden. The second trial dismissed their request for additional compensation, leading to further frustration.

This contains an Mino art

The Ongoing Impact

This case has raised important questions about art sales in the K-pop industry. Many fans and art collectors are now more cautious about purchasing artwork from idol-artists. 

This contains an image of the kpop logo with music notes and flags in the background on a pink background

The incident has also sparked discussions about the need for better regulations in gallery sales.

See Also: BLACKPINK Rosé Live Performance at 2025 French Gala Sparks Debate

Final Thoughts: Will Justice Prevail in WINNER Mino’s Art Dispute?

The case might head to the Supreme Court as the buyer hasn’t received either the artwork or a refund yet. This situation serves as a reminder about the importance of clear communication and proper documentation in art sales. 

This contains an image of South Korea's Court

What do you think about this artistic controversy? Should galleries be held more accountable? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

Scroll to Top